LUPO vs Conversica
Conversica helped define AI lead follow-up. LUPO is the AI inbound SDR. The difference is the job: persistent follow-up on a database versus a real-time front door for live inbound.
The short answer
Choose LUPO when the leads are arriving now. LUPO calls high-intent web form and demo leads back inside sixty seconds, replies to inbound email, books from chat, and answers the phone on the second ring, the inbound channel almost nobody else covers. Every lead is enriched with live company-signal data and scored for buying intent. Pricing is 3,000 to 15,000 USD per month, stated upfront, starting with a 30-day founder-led pilot, fully live in 4 to 8 weeks.
Choose Conversica to work and reactivate a large lead database. Its Revenue Digital Assistants run persistent two-way follow-up over email, SMS, and chat, integrate with Salesforce, HubSpot, and Marketo, and are publicly reported from 2,999 USD per month on annual contracts.
Persistence versus the front door
Conversica's strength is staying power. Its assistants keep a two-way conversation going across a database for as long as it takes, and that motion has earned it a defining place in the category. It suits teams sitting on thousands of dormant leads that nobody has time to work.
LUPO's ground is the moment a buyer arrives. The call that rings twice. The demo form submitted at 11pm that gets a callback inside sixty seconds. The senior buyer who gets a personal email reply with a one-click booking link. One agentic brain runs web form, email, chat, and phone, filters out vendors, tyre-kickers, and wrong-fit prospects, and puts an enriched, scored lead in front of the rep. Median time to first action on qualified inbound is under two minutes, measured in the customer dashboard. See how it works.
If your gap is cold pipeline rather than follow-up, read LUPO vs 11x. If you are comparing website-centric platforms, read LUPO vs Qualified.
At a glance
| LUPO | Conversica | |
|---|---|---|
| Built for | Real-time capture and qualification of live inbound | Working and reactivating large lead databases |
| Channels | Web form, email, chat, and phone, one agentic brain | Email, SMS, and chat |
| Inbound phone | Answers on the second ring, qualifies live, books on the call, 24/7 | Follow-up runs over email, SMS, and chat |
| Enrichment and intent | Every lead enriched (firmographics, technographics, decision-maker title) with live company-signal data, scored on buying-intent triggers: funding, M&A, leadership hires, headcount growth | Lead engagement through persistent two-way conversation |
| Speed | Sub-2-minute median time to first action on qualified inbound, measured in the customer dashboard | Persistence over weeks and months, built to keep following up |
| Integrations | HubSpot, Salesforce, Slack alerts, Google Calendar, Microsoft 365 / Outlook booking, any CRM via webhook | Salesforce, HubSpot, and Marketo |
| Pricing | 3,000 to 15,000 USD per month, stated upfront, 30-day pilot | Publicly reported from 2,999 USD per month on annual contracts |
Sources: Conversica product pages (positioning, channels, integrations). Pricing as publicly reported at the time of writing. Corrections welcome at hello@lupolabs.ai.
Last updated: June 2026
Which one fits your team
Conversica is the better fit when
- The job is reactivating a large, ageing lead database with persistent follow-up
- Email and SMS sequences over weeks are the core motion
- You want a long-established vendor that helped define the category, and annual contracts fit your procurement
LUPO is the better fit when
- Buyers are calling, emailing, and filling forms right now, and speed decides who wins the deal
- You want the phone answered live, 24/7, with meetings booked on the call
- You want every lead enriched and scored for buying intent before a rep sees it
- You want stated pricing and a 30-day founder-led pilot
Common questions
What is the core difference between LUPO and Conversica?
The job. Conversica's Revenue Digital Assistants run persistent two-way follow-up on lead databases over email, SMS, and chat. LUPO is the AI inbound SDR: a real-time front door that answers live inbound across web form, email, chat, and phone, enriches every lead, scores buying intent, and books meetings. See how it works.
Does Conversica answer live inbound phone calls?
Conversica's assistants work over email, SMS, and chat. Live phone answering is LUPO's ground: it picks up on the second ring, 24/7, qualifies the caller, and books the meeting on the call. You can hear it on the homepage, live.
How does LUPO pricing compare to Conversica?
Conversica is publicly reported from 2,999 USD per month on annual contracts. LUPO is 3,000 to 15,000 USD per month, stated upfront, starting with a 30-day founder-led pilot, fully live in 4 to 8 weeks. See LUPO pricing.
Which is better for reactivating old leads?
Conversica. Working and reactivating large lead databases is its strength, and it helped define that category. LUPO is built for live inbound. If reactivation is the whole job, Conversica is the natural pick.
See LUPO on your own inbound.
A 20-minute call with the founder. Bring a real lead from last week and watch LUPO qualify it.